Is omnisphere 1 vs 2 how to#

In the end you can pick either one of them and still get close to the sound you want, but with a slightly different quality in the end, and that just might make it stand out just a bit. If you know what basic waveform you need, for instance a saw, you sample a few of those until you find something that suits your taste.

Like different pianos sound different, but are basically the same core sound. The 200 wavetables are still based on the 4 waveforms you know saw, square, triangle and sine. I agree composing with software is daunting and all those options is often more of a hindrance than a help, when trying to be creative. Omnisphere, to me, kind of represents technology's explosive glut of content, and for me to learn anything, I find I have to manage my exposure to that. I'd just be taking lucky dips from the presets, I wouldn't be learning anything. Personally, I wouldn't want to take on something like Omnisphere. I can look up the instrument's history while I'm working with it, so it can act as a kind of stimulus to learning more about my heritage about an electronic musician, and I feel like I'm learning how it works, I'm kind of getting to know it. It's a good-sounding model of a classic instrument. The only effects are chorus, simple delay, and spring reverb. Everything I can do with it is there on the UI.

Is omnisphere 1 vs 2 how to#

How am I even going to audition those waveforms, let alone get to know how they sound, or learn how to use them creatively? It was the four hundred waveforms (not just waveforms but powerful wavetables) that got me.

and those oscillators have been expanded from 4 waveforms to 'over four HUNDRED'. I just watched Spectrasonics' intro video to Omnisphere, and had to laugh, just after he'd talked about being able to granularise all audio on planet Earth into new instruments, when he said you can design your own sounds from wave oscillators. One problem with electronic music production right now is a glut of options.